![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Maryland DUI Information & News |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicing law since 2002, I have served clients throughout Maryland. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Professional Corporation |
||||||||||||||||||||
| www.crockenlaw.com |
Office locations & hours |
Practice Areas & Fee Schedule |
||||||||||||||||||
| Contact Us |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Maryland Starts Five Month Sobriety Checkpoint "Dragnet" CLICK HERE FOR FULL ARTICLE On Aug. 16, 2005, the State of Maryland started a sobriety checkpoint campaign. At least one checkpoint a week will be established somewhere in the state. KNOW YOUR RIGHTS AT A SOBRIETY CHECK POINT - You have the right to make a U-Turn SAFELY & LEGALLY and not enter the checkpoint; -You can refuse to roll down your window to talk with the police officer. You should be allowed to pass through the checkpoint (however, you may be followed). - To be asked to perform the field sobriety tests (FST) or take a preliminary breath test (PBT) the officer needs to have at least, a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed. You can refuse to take the FST & PBT. Even though the police normally need either probable cause or a reasonable suspicion to stop and detain an automobile, sobriety checkpoints have been held to be legal by the Maryland Court of Appeals (Little v. State, 300 Md. 485 (1984))and the U.S. Supreme Court (Michigan Dept. of St. Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)). A stop at a sobriety checkpoint constitutes a "seizure" within the meaning of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Federal Constitution; however, the stop at a sobriety checkpoint is not an "unreasonable seizure." In determining the validity of sobriety checkpoints, the Courts use a three part test balancing (1) the states interest in preventing drunk driving, (2) the effectiveness of sobriety checkpoints, and (3) the level of intrusion on the individual's privacy. The Courts have stated that there is a compelling interest on the part of the state to stop drunk driving and that sobriety checkpoints are generally effective (1% of all motorists stopped at a checkpoint are arrested on a drunk driving charge). As such, the Courts have generally focused on the third part of the test, the level of intrusion on the individual's privacy. A sobriety checkpoint will be held to be minimally intrusive if the checkpoint is operated under limitations imposed by clear, carefully crafted regulations approved by high level administrators, the discretion of the field officer is severely restricted, all vehicles are stopped, clear procedures are followed when communicating with the motorists, the amount of fright and harassment to the motorists is minimized, and adequate warning of the checkpoint is provided. Stops at a checkpoint usually last less than a minute and the checkpoint should be well illuminated. The checkpoints are generally staffed with sufficient uniformed officers to maintain the safety of the motorists and show legitimate police authority. Officers generally inform the motorist of the sobriety checkpoint and provide some literature regarding drunk driving. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| By submitting the requested information you agree to have an attorney call you. The information you provide is collected by this website for the aforementioned purposes only and is not shared with any third party. Nothing collected or distributed by www.crockenlaw.com creates an attorney/client relationship and all material is intended for informational purposes only. Kenneth E. Crocken is a licensed Maryland lawyer. Privacy Policy. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| HAVE KENNETH E. CROCKEN, ESQ., CALL YOU TO DISCUSS YOUR CASE AT NO CHARGE, WITH NO OBLIGATION. |
||||||||||||||||||||
* * * |